Thursday, July 9, 2009
From The New York
JUMBO Mortgages are Harder to Obtain
As home borrowers for jumbo mortgages, which are loand over $729,500.00, securing financing is harder than it has been for a long time.
Read the full story here.

Tuesday, June 16, 2009
From CNN Money.com
U.S. regulator: Be wary of reverse mortgages
OCC's John Dugan says the loans aimed at older homeowners could target a vulnerable segment.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- Reverse mortgages could be the next subprime mortgage product to experience rapid growth while taking advantage of a vulnerable segment of the population, top U.S. bank regulator John Dugan said Monday.
Dugan, who heads the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and supervises some of the nation's largest banks, said regulators are crafting guidelines to ensure that robust consumer protections are in place for reverse mortgages.
"While reverse mortgages can provide real benefits, they also have some of the same characteristics as the riskiest types of subprime mortgages -- and that should set off alarm bells," Dugan said in prepared remarks to an American Bankers Association conference.
Reverse mortgages are complicated loans targeted at homeowners who are at least 62 years old, and allow older Americans to live off the equity in their homes as they age.
In a reverse mortgage, the homeowner receives money from the lender, which does not have to be repaid as long as the borrower lives in the home.
Fannie Mae (FNM, Fortune 500), the largest provider of U.S. home mortgage funding, had about a 90% share of the reverse mortgage market at the end of 2008. Many large banks such as Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500) and Wells Fargo (WFC, Fortune 500) are big providers of reverse mortgages.
The great majority of reverse mortgages are insured by the Federal Housing Administration and pose limited credit risk. But Dugan said a different class of reverse mortgages -- "proprietary" products -- offer less consumer protections.
Dugan said that as the elderly American population grows, there could be a significant pickup in demand for proprietary reverse mortgages, which he said bear significant similarities to the type of subprime products that helped fuel the housing boom and bust, resulting in a widespread credit crisis and recession.
"I believe the critical lesson here is the need to act early, before problems escalate," Dugan said.
He said regulators need to set more standards for proprietary reverse mortgages. Regulators also need to be vigilant about misleading marketing and need to crack down on any lenders who try to bundle a reverse mortgage with other financial products, such as an annuity or life insurance product, Dugan said.
If those actions are not enough, Dugan said "more definitive regulatory standards may need to be adopted, and the OCC is prepared to do that."

Tuesday, May 19, 2009
From the Associated Press
Housing bottom in sight, but recovery will be slow
By MARTIN CRUTSINGER, AP Economics Writer
Single-family home construction posted a modest rebound in April, raising hopes that the three-year slide in housing is leveling off. But a bulging supply of unsold homes, record levels of foreclosures and still-falling home prices suggest a sustained recovery isn't likely until next spring at the earliest.
Read the full story here.

Posted May 7, 2009
Not all sellers are desperate
Many a buyer remains convinced you can successfully purchase property in any neighborhood for twenty percent less than the asking price. Savvy sellers of single family homes and condos in prime neighborhoods, such as Noe Valley, Cow Hollow, and Pacific Heights, to name just a few, have already taken into consideration the current market and priced their property correctly or even slightly under. As a result, these homes have seen brisk activity, some with multiple offers. The Los Angeles Times has a very good story on this phenomenon and how it is playing out in Southern California; the principles are the same here in San Francisco.
As The Times puts it, "House hunters are trying to pounce on deals from sellers they expected to be frantic -- if not curled in the fetal position. What they're finding instead are bidding wars as low interest rates and pent-up demand in traditionally stable or chic areas have kept prices up -- not as high as the market's peak, but not nearly as low as they had hoped."
Great opportunities remain. Buyers are best served when they look at the market data that supports or refutes the seller's asking price as well as their offer price. In this market especially, what has closed within the last three to five months is crucial.

Posted April 23, 2009
Information taken from the California Association Weekly Market Matters Update
Low rates put some borrowers in a quandary
Borrowers with hybrid adjustable-rate mortgages ? loans that carry a fixed-interest rate for a certain number of years and then reset annually to rates tied to market benchmarks ? are questioning if they should refinance to lock in a low rate for the long term, or if they should keep their adjustable-rate mortgages, currently at interest rates lower than their initial fixed rates.
Some mortgage experts say it's best to refinance out of adjustable-rate mortgages if the borrower plans to live in the home for more than two years.Adjustable-rate mortgages re tied to myriad indices, and today's low rate could jump as the economy recovers and inflation kicks in.The increase would result in borrowers paying more in the long term for an adjustable-rate mortgage than they would if they refinanced into a fixed-rate mortgage.
To read the full story from the Wall Street Journal, please click here

Posted April 15, 2009
Information taken from the California Association of Realtors Website
Written by C.A.R. Legal Department
2009 Home Buyer Tax Credits
|
HOMEBUYER TAX CREDIT |
FEDERAL |
CALIFORNIA |
|
Amount of Tax Credit |
10% of purchase price not to exceed $8,000. |
5% of purchase price, not to exceed $10,000. Maximum tax credit for all taxpayers is $100 million to be allocated on a first-come, first‑served basis. |
|
Principal Residence |
Yes. Property purchased must be the taxpayer's principal residence which is generally the home the taxpayer lives in most of the time (26 U.S.C. § 121). |
Yes. Property purchased must be a qualified principal residence and eligible for the homeowner's exemption from property taxes (Cal. Tax & Rev. Code § 218). |
|
Type of Property |
House, condominium, townhome, manufactured home, apartment cooperative, houseboat, houstrailer, or other type of property located in the U.S. |
Single-family residence, whether detached or attached, condominium, cooperative project unit, houseboat, manufactured home, or mobilehome. |
|
First-time Homebuyer |
Yes. The buyer (and buyer's spouse if any) must not have owned a principal residence during the three-year period before date of purchase. |
No. The buyer need not be a first-time homebuyer. |
|
Unoccupied Property |
No. Property may have been previously occupied or not. |
Yes. Property must have never been previously occupied as certified by the seller. |
|
Minimum Occupancy Requirement |
Must be the buyer's principal residence for 36 months after purchase, otherwise credit must be repaid. |
Must be the buyer's principal residence for 2 years after purchase, otherwise credit must be repaid. |
|
Income Restriction |
Yes. Tax credit begins to phase out if modified adjusted gross income is over $75,000 (or $150,000 for joint filers). No tax credit at all if modified adjusted gross income is over $95,000 (or $170,000 for joint filers). |
No. |
|
Date of Purchase |
January 1, 2009 to November 30, 2009, inclusive.
(Note: A repayable $7,500 tax credit is available for purchases from April 9, 2008 to December 31, 2008.) |
March 1, 2009 to February 28, 2010, unless $100 million funding runs out. |
|
Refundable |
Yes. Any amount of the tax credit not used to reduce the tax owed may be added to the taxpayer's tax refund check. |
No. |
|
Repayment |
The buyer need not repay the tax credit if the buyer owns and occupies the property for at least 36 months after the purchase. |
The buyer need not repay the tax credit if the buyer owns and occupies the property for at least two years immediately following the purchase. |
|
Multiple Buyers
(not married to each other) |
The $8,000 tax credit may be allocated between eligible taxpayers in any reasonable manner. |
The $10,000 tax credit may be allocated between eligible taxpayers based on their percentage of ownership. |
|
Maximum Credit for All Taxpayers |
N/A |
$100 million. |
|
When to Claim |
Full tax credit may be claimed on 2008 or 2009 tax returns. |
1/3 of total tax credit may be claimed each year for 3 successive years (e.g. $3,333 for 2009, $3,333 for 2010, and $3,333 for 2011). |
|
Tax Agency |
Internal Revenue Service (IRS). |
Franchise Tax Board (FTB). |
|
How to File |
First-Time Homebuyer Credit
(IRS Form 5405) to be filed with 2008 or 2009 tax returns |
Specific procedure for claiming credit includes completing an Application for New Home Credit (FTB Form 3528-A). |
|
When to File Form |
Form 5405 must be filed with 2008 or 2009 tax returns. |
FTB Form 3528-A must be faxed by escrow to the FTB within one week after close of escrow and filed with the buyer's 2009 or 2010 tax returns. |
|
Exceptions |
Acquisitions by gift or inheritance, acquisitions from related persons as defined, and buyers who are nonresident aliens. |
Credit allowed is not a business credit under Cal. Tax & Rev. Code § 17039.2. |
|
Legal Authority |
26 U.S.C. section 36. |
Cal. Rev. & Tax Code section 17059 (as amended by Senate Bill 15). |
|
Date of Enactment |
February 17, 2009. |
February 20, 2009. |
Posted April 10, 2009
Walt Molony 202/383-1177 wmolony@realtors.org
Gain Seen In Pending Home Sales, Housing Affordability Sets New Record
WASHINGTON, April 01, 2009
Pending home sales have edged up, hinting at a possible pickup of sales activity in coming months, according to the National Association of Realtors®.
The
Pending Home Sales Index,
1 a forward-looking indicator based on contracts signed in February, rose 2.1 percent to 82.1 from a reading of 80.4 in January, but is 1.4 percent below February 2008 when it was 83.3.
Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, said the market is continuing to underperform. "Pending home sales have a way to go for there to be a meaningful increase, but recent increases in shopping activity are hopeful indicators that we'll see additional sales gains," he said. "More buyers are getting into the market to take advantage of stimulus incentives and much improved housing affordability conditions, but it will take a few months before we could see this turn up in measurable sales contract activity."
Also in February, NAR's Housing Affordability Index2 rose to a new high.
The PHSI in the Northeast rose 10.6 percent to 63.9 in February but is 11.2 percent below a year ago. In the Midwest the index jumped 14.5 percent to 83.1 and is 3.4 percent higher than February 2008. The index in the South rose 4.4 percent to 85.8 in February but is 0.1 percent below a year ago. In the West the index fell 13.5 percent to 89.6 and is 1.7 percent below February 2008.
NAR President Charles McMillan, a broker with Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage in Dallas-Fort Worth, said home buyers are in an excellent position. "The drop in mortgage interest rates and home prices mean the buying power of a typical family has never been better," he said. "If you have a good job and long-term plans, it's unlikely that you'll find a much better time to buy a home. This is especially true for first-time buyers who can qualify for an $8,000 tax credit this year, have a great selection of homes to choose from, and are in a favorable negotiating position."
NAR's Housing Affordability Index rose 0.9 percentage points to a record high of 173.5 in February from an upwardly revised index of 172.6 in January, and is 36.3 percentage points higher than a year ago. The HAI, a broad measure of housing affordability using consistent values and assumptions over time, shows that the relationship between home prices, mortgage interest rates and family income is the most favorable since tracking began in 1970.
A median-income family, earning $59,700, could afford a home costing $285,600 in February with a 20 percent downpayment, assuming 25 percent of gross income is devoted to mortgage principal and interest. Affordability conditions for first-time buyers with the same income and small downpayments are roughly 80 percent of that amount. The affordable price is considerably higher the median existing single-family home price in February, which was only $164,600.
"Obviously, potential home buyers need to be managing their existing debt effectively," McMillan said. "A Realtor® can counsel you on what you may be able to afford given your personal financial situation. In some cases, buyers who want to build their future through homeownership may need to start reducing their debt and improving their credit score before entering the housing market."
Last year at this time, the typical family could afford a home costing $265,600, which is $20,000 less than the current affordable price. "Homes in many areas are now selling for less than replacement construction costs ? clearly this is an abnormal situation which will change once inventory is drawn down and supply and demand come closer into balance," McMillan said.
Yun said he expects housing inventories to rise through early summer from a normal seasonal pattern of more sellers appearing in the spring. "But with the positive housing stimulus incentives now in place, we expect home sales to gain momentum in the second half of the year with first-time buyers absorbing a lot of the excess inventory," he said. "Under these conditions, we should see price stabilization in most markets by the end of the year."
# # #
1The Pending Home Sales Index is a leading indicator for the housing sector, based on pending sales of existing homes. A sale is listed as pending when the contract has been signed but the transaction has not closed, though the sale usually is finalized within one or two months of signing.
The index is based on a large national sample, typically representing about 20 percent of transactions for existing-home sales. In developing the model for the index, it was demonstrated that the level of monthly sales-contract activity from 2001 through 2004 parallels the level of closed existing-home sales in the following two months. There is a closer relationship between annual index changes (from the same month a year earlier) and year-ago changes in sales performance than with month-to-month comparisons.
An index of 100 is equal to the average level of contract activity during 2001, which was the first year to be examined as well as the first of five consecutive record years for existing-home sales.
Each March, NAR Research conducts a review of PHSI seasonal adjustment factors and fine-tunes data for the past three years.
2The Housing Affordability Index is a relative index where a value of 100 means that a family with the median income has exactly enough income to qualify for a mortgage on a median-priced existing single-family home, taking into account the relationship between median home price, average effective interest rate for loans closed on existing homes, and median family income. The higher the index, the better housing affordability is for buyers.
The calculation assumes a downpayment of 20 percent and a qualifying ratio of 25 percent of gross income for mortgage principle and interest payments. The index is a general gauge with conditions varying widely around the country. Affordability conditions are lower for first-time buyers with smaller downpayments and less income.
Monthly publication of the index began in 1981 with annual data calculated back to 1970.
Existing-home sales for March will be released April 23; the next Pending Home Sales Index will be on May 4.